We successfully created a library containing H. elongata metagenomic inserts and now we want to select it for salt tolerance genes. Ideally, this will allow us to identify salt-tolerance genes that are even more effective than IrrE. We also want to hash out the experimental procedure for selection and identify a selection workflow that works.
Stocks of libraries that will be selected:
Strain | Construct | Library size | Metagenomic origin |
---|---|---|---|
s.Ec.C.00348 | c.00185.pTwist_BsT-mStayGold_Barcode-GG | 1.1 million transformants | None, just barcode. |
s.Ec.C.00349 | c.00186.pTwist_BsT-mStayGold_Barcode-GG-MetagenomicLib | 5.9mil transformants. NEB 10-Beta E-Comp Cells. | 6/13 F1 H. elongata fragmented genome inserted into linearized barcoded library. |
s.Ec.C.00350 | c.00186.pTwist_BsT-mStayGold_Barcode-GG-MetagenomicLib | 8.7mil transformants. NEB 10-Beta E-Comp Cells. | 6/13 H1 H. elongata fragmented genome inserted into linearized barcoded library. |
These libraries are still in the 10beta cloning strain, which is good enough for now. Eventually we’d like them to be in K-12.
The general experimental design here is:
The watchword here is avoiding bottlenecking.
First we’ll need to figure out how much glycerol stock to take to get a good library size. Our target is in the 50-100 million CFU range.
Second, let’s do 3 mL cultures and transfer 100 uL from each culture to the next, which should be about 250 million cells, but it still allows ~8 generations in each culture. Over 6 growths that’s 48 generations, which should be enough to see 1% fitness advantages.
This is a new experiment. It’s going to take some fiddling to figure out.
Experimental design: